Hi Rob ...
> -There is a motor although it is a pain
> not being able to remove it (since
> manual advance actually has virtues,
> it is the preferred option for me much of
> the time)
You know what my general preferences are, but I'm curious what you
think the advantages of manual advance are. Frankly, I wouldn't
mind having a smallish, light-weight body with a built-in film
advance. It would not, of course, replace my manual advance
cameras, but I think it's a feature that I'd enjoy having the option
of using. The additional weight and size of accessory winders are
sometimes annoying.
>
> -0.5 steps of exposure compensation is
> plenty, why would you need more, I
> would like +-4 stops however
The idea of exposure comp in only ½ increments does bother me. I
like the 1/3 stop options, as can be found on the LX. +/- 2 stops
however has always been adequate. In what situations might you need
as much as four stops?
> -I can lean to live with the display information.
Don't need no steenkin' display information <g>.
> For me it appears to be a worthy step into the AF realm,
It certainly seems like a pretty good option ...
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
