What ever happened to that film breakthrough I read about a few years ago, 384,000 ISO. Supposedly AGFA was working
on it, and Kodak had some kind of me too announcement. Guess Digital killed it.


Rob Studdert wrote:

On 9 Jun 2004 at 18:52, Alan Chan wrote:



I think the "IS" alone for telephotos is a good enough reason to switch, if one
needs it. Nothing else matter if the images were blurred due to slow shutter
speed. I often found myself struggling with 1/60s even with ISO400 film when
using 200/2.8 & 300/4.5 w/o tripod. I wonder why I am still with Pentax
sometimes. :-)



I generally have far more problems with subject movement than I do with camera shake, I don't need IS I need ISO 128000 with no noise.



Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998








Reply via email to