How could Tom's pics be pro-Reagan? Tom showed us his views of the event. I saw nothing "Reagan" in them at all. Had I been there I would have taken the same images so I could the sense of what happened at the state funeral.
Jim A. > From: Antonio Aparicio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:29:45 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: reagan cortege > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:29:51 -0400 > > And one of the most unpopular to the rest of the world, particularly > Latin America (remember Honduras and Nicaragua?) and Iraq (where he > setup Sadam Hussein with a nice set of weapons to kill his own people), > or perhaps Afghanistan (where his policies left Bin Laden and co. setup > and nice little training camp after supporting him and the Taleban with > weapons and cash to kick out the Russians). > > Sure he helped put and end to the cold war, but he also played an > important role in sewing the seeds of todays problems. > > Toms pics were nice, pro-reagan patriotic pics - particularly the one > of the horse. > > Antonio > > On 11 Jun 2004, at 00:18, Bob W wrote: > >> Whether you liked him or not, Reagan was the >> most popular President in American history and his funeral is an >> important news event. >> >> I thought Tom's photos were excellent, particularly the riderless >> horse, >> which I think is as good an example as any I've seen in the press of >> that >> image. >
