I suppose bird shooters would love the 300/2 which is practically 600/2. Just imagine how big the 600/4 is for 135.

Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

Interesting lenses. But one has to note that the DOF of 150/2 is still
that of a 150mm f/2 lens, and the lack of good noise at higher
iso means that it is just the same. At least I think so. I don't see
the advantage here. Faster lenses are offset by smaller sensor's lack
of noise. Nobody might have 300/2 but everybody has 200/2 which is the
same size and does the same. And even your bread-and-butter 2.8 70-210
zoom is equal to 300/2.8 on APS format, the difference between 2.8 and
2 of olympus is equal to the difference between usable iso 1600 and
usable iso 800 on the oly. So everything is similar. No advantage?

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines




Reply via email to