Cotty said:
> Yeah but isn't that the point? Shouldn't they be comparing the Baby *ist
> D to the Rebel? Of course the *ist D is better than the 300D -- it can't
> not be.
> 
> Pentax still has a very reputable branding - if the Baby D was priced
> about the (relevant) Nikon / Canon entry level, it would sell.
> 

Please rephrase.
"if the Baby D was priced about the (relevant) Nikon / Canon entry level AND 
ADVERTISED, it would sell."

ERN


Reply via email to