Cotty said: > Yeah but isn't that the point? Shouldn't they be comparing the Baby *ist > D to the Rebel? Of course the *ist D is better than the 300D -- it can't > not be. > > Pentax still has a very reputable branding - if the Baby D was priced > about the (relevant) Nikon / Canon entry level, it would sell. >
Please rephrase. "if the Baby D was priced about the (relevant) Nikon / Canon entry level AND ADVERTISED, it would sell." ERN