On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Alan Chan wrote: > saving money for DSLRs and digital lenses now. 87/2.4 is just too close to > FA77 and would be a mistake imho.
Why? Was it a mistake to have 50s at 1.4, 1.7 and 2.8 at the same time? I thought macros (like the 87 Paal is talking about) are a different ball-game. Kostas
