Re: It's over (was Re: Ilford in trouble? and digi snappers)

[Paul Stenquist]

My last days shooting film found me shooting 6x7 transparency film for 
most of my important work. The lab that processed it was a very well 
known pro lab and the film looked good. Except for the fact that they 
kept ruining the first exposure by kinking the film when they attached 
it to the clip on their machine. So I was down to nine exposures per 
roll, and they were expensive exposures at that. I think that was the 
straw that broke the camel's back. As someone else said, I have 
complete control when I shoot digital. That works for me.
Paul
On Aug 25, 2004, at 8:07 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:

On 25 Aug 2004 at 15:22, Caveman wrote:
Kept changing them. They were all full of surprises. Then I thought 
I'll
be much safer with slides. Until here comes this nightshots film, cut
with a huge offset to the frames. So I decided that those guys won't 
be
able to touch anything but some copies of my CDs. Let them lose them,
scratch them, eat them, insert them wherever they want, I don't care
anymore.
I've finally found a place where it's not too bad but only because I 
can get my
films DnD processed and they simply sleeve them in the continuous 
sleeve and
roll them up.

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998