Hi! >> >> I think Boris has the K24/3.5 (just like me, you see? :-) >> >> Kostas >>
ft> Okay, ft> In that case, Boris, get a 20mm lens. They're even more fun than a 24mm... Kostas and Frank - you're both wrong. I have K 24/2.8. What I found out about my very M 35/2.8 is two things: 1. At f/2.8 and f/4 it gives very pleasing results 2. At f/5.6 and on the look of the picture is anything but pleasing. I cannot really explain what displeases me, but it would seem as if the result is over-sharpened - if it makes any sense to you. I've shot 2 films exclusively with that lens on my trip to Norway and I will have to review these scans very carefully. Also my ME Super keeps giving me warnings. On one of these two films two frames just overlapped - no inter-frame distance whatsoever. I am starting to think that I have to get rid of it :(... And then I will have to think of AF optics in favor of my older glass... Frankly :), I am not sure where do I go these days, so for now I am keeping things as they are... Lon, who said this list was any good anyway? ;) Boris ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
