I don't see how you shoot multiexposure landscapes without the light/scene changing during the multiple exposures. I often (most of the time) have to wait for the sun, clouds, etc, even wind to get the decisive moment, so I KNOW stitching is totally out of question for me.
JCO -----Original Message----- From: Larry Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses >Hi Larry, >Good luck with the sale. So is it safe to assume that you are pleased enough >with the scope and capability of your stitched *ist D images that you >can no >longer justify retaining the LF system? >Cheers, >Rob Studdert Yes. Since I shoot landscapes almost exclusively, I don't have to worry with my subject moving, so I can take as many images as I need to get the resolution I need after they are stitched. With the sharpening and noise removal software that is available now I can get as large as I want and still be noise free and sharp enough to print very large. I just sold my Epson 2200 and have an Epson 4000 on it's way. When it arrives later this week the first image I print will be a panorama of 10 images that is 20000x5000 or there abouts. Could I have done this with my 4x5? Sure, but I didn't have to haul all that heavy equipment 5 miles to get the shot either. >Are you selling a body also? >Kevin No, It's simply an old folding Anba, not worth much. > HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA > HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA > HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ....................... >LOL, you are so predictable JCO :-) Laugh all you want JCO. You have not seen my stitched images printed. Larry from Prescott
