IT CANT for me. I KNOW. Like I said, I often have to wait for a clearing of the clouds or the wind to settle or people to get out of the way etc. If I had to stitch I might get 1/10 of the shots possible without stitching.. NO FRICKING WAY. I am not going to go to the hassle of driving to locations only to get shut out by an inferior slower technique with a lot of serious practical drawbacks compared to "instant" photography. To me LANDSCAPE is not static , a studio is, but not nature. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: help on sale of large format lenses Look at some of the photos Larry's posted. You'll see that it can be done. Check some tutorials on line (or off, for that matter). Shel > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't see how you shoot multiexposure landscapes without the > light/scene changing during the multiple exposures. I often (most of > the time) have to wait for the sun, clouds, etc, even wind to get the > decisive moment, so I KNOW stitching is totally out of question for > me.
