Yeah??
--- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that in the digital era you'll change the
> body more often than
> the lenses.
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > Caveman,
> > J. C. O'Connell's question asserts that body I.S.
>
> > is, obviously, a better idea..and I agree. That
> is,
> > unless their competition wants to sell more
> lenses.
> > 'ya think?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Canon and Nikon already addressed it and Mr.
> >>Harakiri is too Limited.
> >>
> >>J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I just saw a magazine ad for the new Minolta
> >>>Maxxum DSLR (their first DSLR ever) and it has
> >>
> >>Image stabilization
> >>
> >>>in the BODY. what I don't understand is why
> >>>canon/nikon/pentax didn't do this already?
> >>>JCO
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > http://vote.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
