I bought the 16-45 with the D, with the rebate the lens was only about $200.00 US. Don't really use it much but it is a very fine piece of glass.
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina > ATX Pro > > > It wasn't the DG- just the EX DF (the first incarnation wasn't DF, i.e. no > focus 'clutch'- think those float about the used market quite > often..) Have > they released the DG 28-70 2.8 already? Guess I haven't been keeping up to > date. When I purchased mine 3 years ago, it was just before the 24-70 2.8 > came out. The 24-70's supposed to have better glass (the 28-70's got 2 > aspherical elements while the 24-70's got 2 or 3 aspherical elements and 2 > or 3 low dispersion elements), however the 24-70's got an rather > large 82mm > filter thread (as opposed to a 77mm).. > > Hmm I thought you might be buying it for a film body because it > was a 28-70. > I found it a bit frustrating to have lost the 28mm on the ist D. Did you > consider using some of the funds from your recent gear sales to top up and > get a DA 16-45 f4 instead? > > Cheers, > Ryan > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 6:52 PM > Subject: RE: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina ATX > Pro > > > > Thanks Ryan, I will be using it on the ist D. > > Was yours the EX or the EX DG? > > > > Don > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:46 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina > > > ATX Pro > > > > > > > > > Hi Don, > > > > > > Just a word of caution, if you're planning to mate this lens with > > > an ist D, > > > don't. After my personal experience with it, and heck of a lot of > > > probing, I > > > more or less confirmed that Pentax and Sigma Japan are currently > resolving > > > an autofocus issue concerning the Sigma EX 28-70 2.8 DF and the ist D. > > > > > > However, if you're planning to use this with a film body (I've > > > used it on a > > > 5n and an mz50), I'll vouch that it is a beautiful lens, great > > > build, warm, > > > contrasty glass, useful lens shade too. Plenty sharp at 2.8, but > > > between 5.6 > > > to 11 it's up there with the best of them. > > > > > > Here's a gallery of some shots which I only recently had time to > > > update. All > > > with the 28-70 2.8 and a 5n, except for 'Builders', 'Donna & Mel' > > > and 'Pete > > > & Christine' which were manually focused on an ist D. > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=309526 > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ryan > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:29 AM > > > Subject: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina ATX > Pro > > > > > > > > > > Now that I have decided that I need a short fast zoom I need a > > > little help > > > > deciding which one. > > > > The Sigma is less than half the price of the Tokina, but how is the > > > quality? > > > > I've not heard anything bad about the EX series lenses but > I'd like to > > > hear > > > > from someone that has used one. > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
