Hi Larry.
Welcome aboard. I snipped your post a tad.
Cannot speak for the Pentax version as i dont have one, yet, but i do a lot of
equestrian
work with my
Nikon f2.8 and it works out very well.I;'d have to say atleast 97-98% usable,well
focused
shots from it.
If i am following a Dressage rider around the ring,i keep it on AF-C and shoot at will.
I think for soccer you should find a huge difference from the mf lenses.You allready
say
you have mf
f2.8 lenses so that should give you a good idea what you can get in low light.
I do have some problems in ~really~ low light, but nothing that bothers me.
Dave Brooks
. Since all of my
> lenses save one (16-45 DA) are MF I have no good way to judge whether
> I would see a significant improvement focusing in the fast pace and
> questionable night lighting found at high school soccer games. So what
> is the opinion of people that have used both? Is it worth buying an AF
> lens to get improved focusing? > Thanks,
>
> Larry Cook
> www.cook-imaging.com <http://www.cook-imaging.com>
>
>
