With the battery grip attached, the *istD is a nice size for me. Without the grip, it's too small for real work, but perfect for social affairs. Paul
> On 11/11/04, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >I completely agree with you about feels and looks; the ist D is a gorgeous > >little thing, and it's not too shabby specwise either. However, I'm not > >deeply invested in Pentax glass, and my love affair is more with the mz5n or > >the mz3 bodies (samples of wonderfully thoughtful design). I'll be hanging > >on to that forever, but having played around with the 20D, I can't say the > >same- it almost feels like it's anticipating to be replaced already! > > Let me guess, you're going to put tape over the word 'Canon', right? > > I think the *ist D is a beautiful and well-crafted piece of kit. But am I > the only one on the planet who doesn't like it's small size? I love the > weight and size of bigger bodies. (cue WW) > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > >
