My A2X-S is very sharp with either my 400/5.6 K or my 200/4 M. I have an
18x12 print of a race car that I shot with the 400/2XS combo that really
leaves nothing to be desired in terms of sharpness. I don't think the L
converters will fit the 300/4.5, but I could be wrong. Generally, the L
converters fit only the really big glass, but there are some exceptions.
Paul
> Bob Keefer wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I have the Pentax 2X-S teleconverter, which frankly doesn't produce
> very sharp images with my FA*300/4.5, not even locked down into
> the tripod with careful technique. (I get better slides with my son's
> Canon 300/4.0 with a Canon 2X. Sorry.)
>
> Anyone know whether the 2X-L would be any better?
>
> Also, any thoughts on the 1.4X-L?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob Keefer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
