Only if it's the Dao of Film...

Jens Bladt wrote:

Is it still allowed to discuss film on thsi list?
(I confess to still using MF film - schssss - don't tell anyone, but the
pics are very nice and hardly ever have burned out highlights!)

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. januar 2005 13:02 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: More Enablement was[Re: Enablement A Go-Go!!]


NOTE: Items 3 & 4.

Buddhism, BTW, specifically does not believe in a God.

Anyway, taking your point, Frank, I do not think we can allow discussions
about
 digital photography on the list anymore. GRIN!

---

religion

religion (rī-līj“en) noun
Abbr. rel., relig.
1.      a. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded 
as
creator and governor of the universe. b. A personal or institutionalized
system
grounded in such belief and worship.
2.      The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
3.      A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a
spiritual
leader.
4.      A cause, a principle, or an activity pursued with zeal or conscientious
devotion.

- idiom.
get religion Informal.
To accept a higher power as a controlling influence for the good in one's
life.

 [Middle English religioun, from Old French religion, from Latin religio,
religion-, perhaps from religāre, to tie fast. See rely.]

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition
copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed
from
INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution restricted in
accordance
with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


frank theriault wrote:


On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:50:50 -0500, Jeff Tokayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


wrote:




We're talking about the Digital religion. ;-)


That explains it.  The notion that digital capture and reproduction of
images is superior to film is nothing more than a belief system
unsupported by empirical evidence.  That fits most definitions of
religion that I know of.  All you need is a diety (although I've heard
of some silly people calling atheism a religion - which it clearly
isn't - and they don't have a diety, do they?).

cheers,
frank

ps:  I'm joking, so please, no frantic posts telling me how inferior
film is to digital and how digital is killing film and how film is
dying.  I know all that stuff.  I was merely making a funny..






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005








--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to