On 16/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed: >So you equate grain, or rather, the lack of it, an indicator of quality ... >correct?
No, not really. Grain was the wrong word to use, I hereby retract it. I find film (col neg that is) gives a 'spongy' feel to prints, I really don't know how to describe it properly. Digital shots seem 'cleaner', more representative of the scene... somebody help. What do I mean?? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
