"But for the purpose of comparing digitally recorded images and images recorded on film, everything else has to be as equal as possible". I don't think that's true. If you really want to compare digitally recorded images with film recorded images, you'll have to use the method which will minimize the information loss (it could be different in the 2 cases).
Alex Sarbu On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:28:23 -0500, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I created some jibberish here. I started out to say, "I see > thousands of prints a month. I haven't seen an optical color print in > years." But I meant to delete that, because it's beside the point. A > second experiment comparing a color optical print and a color inkjet > print would add more information. But for the purpose of comparing > digitally recorded images and images recorded on film, everything else > has to be as equal as possible. Of course this still isn't a valid > scientific experiment. But I know it will demonstrate that, at least in > terms of the way I work, there is so little difference between film and > digital, that even experts are unable to determine which is which. For > the way others work, that might not be true. >
