damn lawyer! :) but, even given all the fine print, i still find the presumption overly optimistic.
as a side note, maybe some people here have noticed that in my country there were elections (which have finally ended in an inauguration) not that long time ago. and i have to say that the coverage, in the most official and, presumably, "neutral" news, on *both* sides could be said to be "grounded on reality" only as much as the the names of the candidates were spelled (mostly) correctly. nothing more. no, i'm not talking about USA. best, mishka On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:07:03 -0500, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mishka: > > I wrote the paragraph to which you refer very carefully. I attempted > to write it in such a way that every word had meaning, and was > meaningful.
