On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:09:49 -0500, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> damn lawyer!
> :)
> 
> but, even given all the fine print, i still find the presumption
> overly optimistic.
> 
> as a side note, maybe some people here have noticed that in my country
> there were elections (which have finally ended in an inauguration) not that
> long time ago.  and i have to say that the coverage, in the most official and,
> presumably, "neutral" news, on *both* sides could be said to be "grounded
> on reality" only as much as the the names of the candidates were spelled
> (mostly) correctly. nothing more.
> 
> no, i'm not talking about USA.
> 

Just a bike messenger, Mishka, just a bike messenger...  <vbg>

I understand your cynicism, BTW, and share your wariness of some
(many?) journalists (despite my "optimism" <g>).

One of these days, we'll share a couple of beers, and have a wonderful
conversation!  <g>

cheers,
frank

-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to