Bill she's quite lovely. Seeing these she doesn't need anywhere near the amount of Gaussian blur you originally used.
I had a bit of a play and at that image size I found 0.8 pixels of blur was enough, but still keeping the eye's, lips & hair sharp. BTW after having another look, IMGP7183ns is now my favorite. Just my thoughts. Dave S On Apr 7, 2005 12:45 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need a shorter URL.... > > Anyway, this is straight off the RAW converter, where I adjusted white > balance and exposure, and nothing else. > The files were resized for the web, no sharpening or softening. > > Lens used was the 77mm at around f/8. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb//pictures/flannery/sharp/flanneryns_index.html > > > William Robb > >
