Thanks for the feedback Eric. I'm somewhat torn myself, so it's good to get some other opinions. Paul
c> At 11:50 pm 13/04/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hi Bruce, > >Yes, it was flat light. But warm flat light can be nice for flowers. > >Here's the side by side. > >No flash: > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278916 > > > >Flash: > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3275980 > > > >I like them from straight on. Particularly when the cone and petals are a > >different color. I've shot them from a lot of different angles as well, > >but head-on is ?robably my favorite daffodil look. That's highly > >subjective of course. > > > >Paul > > Hi Paul, > I don't normally like the harshness of flash arcing across the stygian > darkness (yep, I realise this is just fill in flash here) photos but here > it really seems to help bring out the 3D form of the daffodil compared to > the non-flash photo. I like it, and the yellow shadow on the white petals. > There seems to be more texture in the petals too. > Eric. > > >
