John
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:41:55 +0100, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm dithering right now between these three lenses : The Voigtlander 75/2.5 (manual focus), 289+50$hood at CameraQuest the SMCP-FA 28-105 3.2-4.5, 210$ at B&H the SMCP-FA 24-90 3.5-4.5. 430$$ at B&H.
B&H has 300US$ of my money right now, as I missed out on the 35/f2 stock*, so the 24-90 is only another 130$ - that's cheap! :)
I'd love to hear from anyone who has the 24-90 - *is* it worth the premium over the 28-105? the comments at Stan's (http://stans-photography.info/) are mostly positive, but don't answer my questions. Does anyone know of any lens tests of either of these?
jp
* I'm a patient person, but they've had my money for a month now and can't tell me when or if I might see a lens. (During which time I've acquired two lenses from eBay - A 50/2, and a Tamron 70-300) maybe I should get the FA 24/2 in stead of the 35/2? AARGH. too many lenses, going away too quickly!
On Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:20 PM Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For me, what fills that gap is either an FA28-105/3.2-4.5 or F35-70/3.5-4.5.
I know: you were looking for a prime ... but there aren't a lot of primes in that range.
The 28-105 is a very sweet lens, I'm liking it a lot. I am told the FA24-90 is even better, but at double the money I wonder how much better it really is.
Godfrey
On Apr 20, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
hate to doAny suggestions, other than the 77Ltd. (Which I can't afford) for manual focus primes to fill the gap between 50 and 85mm? I'm good down to 16mm and up to 400, but 50-85 is a pretty big hole, and I'd rather not fill it with a zoom. I was thinking of the K35/2 with a good 7 element 2x but Ithat to that nice lens. ;-/
Don
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.1 - Release Date: 20/04/2005