I store/archive RAW and 8bit TIFF files after editting.
bye
Ramesh
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:36:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Received: from host24.websitesource.com ([209.239.33.40]) by
mc7-f37.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 30 Apr 2005
12:40:27 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by host24.websitesource.com
(8.12.10/8.12.10) id j3UJbDdJ003243;Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:37:13 -0400
X-Message-Info: LGjzam7y+LtdT0eyMlYQFReSSn1jfIs7INISgTfUgWA=
Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:36:29 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
X-Mailing-List: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> archive/latest/163054
X-Loop: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2005 19:40:27.0734 (UTC)
FILETIME=[75E94760:01C54DBC]
You'll get superior results if you upsize your pic when you convert rather
than in PhotoShop. I almost always convert my *istD images as 144 megabyte
16-bit files. That gives me a lot to work with, and they're the perfect
size for making 360 dpi inkjets on 13" x 19" paper. Of course I change the
mode to 8-bit before printing.
Paul
On Apr 30, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Ramesh Kumar wrote:
I tried once 20% extrapolation.
good conversion
What you mean by this?
I use ImageSize option in PS without any layers..is that not efficient?
Thanks
Ramesh
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 09:32:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Received: from host24.websitesource.com ([209.239.33.40]) by
mc7-f34.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 30 Apr
2005 06:33:17 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by host24.websitesource.com
(8.12.10/8.12.10) id j3UDXBKo006425;Sat, 30 Apr 2005 09:33:11 -0400
X-Message-Info: LGjzam7y+LuRiSsjnR3DrquwkVCaPMKeDCK0/sf8bw4=
Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 09:32:17 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
X-Mailing-List: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> archive/latest/163012
X-Loop: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2005 13:33:17.0374 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2ACB1DE0:01C54D89]
On Apr 29, 2005, at 10:32 PM, Ramesh Kumar wrote:
I used to get 5300x3400 pixels from 35mm scans and never worried about
printing on 13x19' paper. I do not have that luxury with *istD, and miss
it.
Shoot RAW with your *istD and convert in PSCS at the highest
interpolation setting. This will give you a 6144 by 4101 pixel count. If
you do a good conversion of a good shot, it will print better on 13 x19
than anything you can get from film. I've done numerous comparisons. I
know that to be a fact.
Paul
