On 4/30/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not bogus. Its a comparison of what is accessible to most > photographers working with a normal budget. I'm going to slightly agree with Paul here. My reasons for choosing to proof and print with a scanner and printer are simply convenience and economics. After selling our home in St. Louis (where I had access to a decent B&W lab) and moving into a rental in Eastjeesis, PA (where I don't have access to a nearby B&W lab or space for a darkroom), I'm left with little choice. I love film, and I've seen really good results from scanned film. But once we purchase another home, I'm putting in a real darkroom and letting the "digital darkroom" rot.
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com
