Now he asks...
Christian wrote:
Hey, can you guys change the subject line of this thread? please? :-)
Christian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
i have much more than Paul has, 1.2 terabyte RAID array. i've always
stored
my slide and RAW images at about 60-70 megabytes whenever possible. some
images have been cropped or otherwise are not suitable for double
resolution
are stored at native resolution. the slide scans are native at 60-70
megabytes.
why would anyone not store up res version? all of the processing has been
done already. i've abandoned CD and DVD backup because they cost more and
are much slower for large amounts of backup and restore. everything is on
the RAID array and backed up to external drives of sufficient size, right
now, a pair of 500GB drives. when the RAID exceeds 500GB of used space,
there are 1TB and 1.6TB external drives to use. if i really wanted to, i
could replace the 250G drives in the array with 400GB drives.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
Yes I understood that, I was just suprised that the res-ed up pic was
what
he
chose to store as his archive version. It seems as if he must own a disk
drive
company.
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
