Shel,

I think this is a tremendous shot. The patterns are so strong, and so effective, that I think they render the human figure superfluous. If you can go back, when the light is right, it would be nice to try the shot with nobody there. For me, it would work, and work better.

John

On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:44:38 +0100, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Shel,
I look forward to the "more blurry fellow".
May convey a state of confusion as though finding
himself in a 'too' advanced geometry class. In which
case, it would only make sense if so titled.

Jack

--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if I should make the fellow even more
blurry.  I was thinking of
doing just that.  What say ye?  (Well, I'm gonna try
it anyway)

Shel


> [Original Message] > From: Cesar

> >It works for a bit - all the converging lines and
white leading
> >directly to a FACELESS person.  The center of it
all just falls apart
> >for me.  Almost like a nice crescendo and
then...nothing.
> >
> >
> Thanks Bruce, I could not have put it better
myself.
>
> As an engineer, English is not my forté,
>
> César
> Panama City, Florida





                
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 10/05/2005




-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 10/05/2005



Reply via email to