Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > Ann, > > A circular works on any camera. A linear polarizer can cause problems > on cameras that have complex light paths to the AF or exposure meter > sensor.
yup - I know. I had to switch to circular when I got my Lx's Linear polarizers are cheaper and more efficient than > circular ones, that's why it's important to know the distinction and > when they can be used. OTOH - I didn't know that linear's were more efficient... at least I don't recall knowing it :) The only camera I have witht he 58 thread is the Pro-1 so I can do with either.... So who out three has one and needs a 72??? :) ann > > Godfrey > > On May 20, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > This is funny -- I never got paul's first post - > > > > The 72 polarizer I'm selling, btw is NOT a > > circular one... > > I'll take either in the 58 (if, as in a film > > camera, the circular > > works on all o 'em.) > > > > ann > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> > >> Thanks for the correction. > >> > >> > >>> That's not correct: the Canon Pro-1 does not require a circular > >>> polarizer. It has no beam splitters or reflecting mirrors in the > >>> light path to any sensor. > ...
