I'm very intersted in that and any further development you might add :) Doable under Win$ ?
2005/6/13, Wigwam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's what I like about Linux/Perl and scripting - do it once, let the > script do it from there on in. I dump the images in my 'raw' directory, > my script runs every five minutes, looking for new files to convert. > Finds one, invokes dcraw, then pipes result to imagemagick, saves as tif > and jpg - jpg then is ftp'd to my website, all nice and comfy. Five > minutes after I dump the day's shooting, the proofs are online for > viewing. Not perfect - they're proofs! If I see one that stands out, I > either go back to the TIF or the RAW and redo it by hand - works a > treat. I figure I manually process one out of thirty or so - if that. > Most are just dross, but that's ok. > > Right now, I'm just ftp'ing jpg files to my website - in the future, I > hope to have all the EXIF data embedded in an XML file and shot up with > the jpg, then converted to html when called by a web browser. Oooh, I > get shivers just thinking about it. Very do-able, I just haven't gotten > to it yet. > > If I have to do it once, that's one thing. If I have to do it twice, > that calls for a script. Programmers are lazy, that's why we're cool. > > Best, > > Wiggy > > Herb Chong wrote: > > > free has certain advantages, but if you have to put in twice as much > > work, how much is your time worth? > > > > Herb... > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wigwam Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:15 PM > > Subject: Re: First *ist Ds shots > > > > > >> Works pretty well for me after I feed it to imagemagick, but hey, > >> it's free. Freeeeeeee. I like that part. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- ---------------------- Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
