I am a bit surprised that we all so easily accept and agree with the idea that the tool we use is a mere disposable item. And that's less than decade after the cameras were being praised for their durability.
Cheers, Leon >-----Original Message----- >From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:49 PM >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >Subject: RE: *ist D discontinued ? > >Its not a ridiculous hypothetical. In the past it was very >common to be able to buy FILM cameras with better buiid >quality that offered no better features or performance than >much lower priced models. >These cameras were durable and build to last. >IMHO, this is not necessary with current digital cameras but >it does not mean that these cameras wont be offered ( i.e. >like a digital leica ?) JCO > >-----Original Message----- >From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:41 PM >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >Subject: Re: *ist D discontinued ? > > >and I will repost this: "Your argument is based on ridiculous >hypotheticals" > >Christian > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> >Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:36 PM >Subject: RE: *ist D discontinued ? > > >> Read my first word: "IF". >> I never stated this was actually the case. >> I was just trying to make the point that >> I would not pay signifigant amount of >> money just for better build quality DSLR ( as I WOULD >> in the past for a film SLR). >> JCO >
