That works well for me...especially there is no way I can afford the product
now. :)
As I read more, it sounds as if the additional focusing areas would be cool
if the autofocus mechanism was faster/more accurate. I would spring for the
$$$ eventually for that.
Thanks for the info -
J
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Doug Brewer
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S (Please help me understand)
Which would cause the price of the MZ-S to drop as well...
Good point
At 10:04 PM -04006/16/01, Mark D. , under cross examination, admitted:
>Jeff,
>
>One more thing to keep in mind is that Pentax has, at times, replaced a
body
>fairly soon after its release. The PZ-1 turned PZ-1p and ZX-5 turned ZX-5n.
>(Putting on flame-retardent suit) If you're hesistant at all about the
MZ-S,
>it might well be worthwhile to see if a MZ-Sn comes out in a couple of
>years.
>
>Mark
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
