Yes. My guess is that the first one (5497) was shot by the FA 2/24mm. Quite a lot of Chromatic Aberration in that first shot! Nice lens - the second one (5502) - the A 2.8/24mm, right?
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 20. juni 2005 01:11 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: RE: FA24/2.0 on Ds - example On 19 Jun 2005 at 21:32, Jens Bladt wrote: > Hi Bob > What problems? > I have used this lens for close-up journalistic work. > (I have discovered, that pro's use a wide angle and then go very close to > the subject. > Brilliant and very sharp lens - even at F.2 - IMO. Some people can live within it's limitations others can't, rather than have an it's good it's bad round again why not check out the following two pics, they are full resolution so they are about 3.7MB each. Both were shot on a tripod on the same body, both at f2.8 and both carefully manual focussed. In short test finalized my decision to sell my FA24.2 lens(s). Without looking at the EXIF data can you tell which image was shot with the FA24/2 and which was the A24/2.8? http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP5497.jpg http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP5502.jpg Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
