That's part of my problem. Since getting the digital body, I've been shooting almost exclusively digital, but I'm not certain I want to hang up the film bodies yet.
So am I hearing that the performance of the DA50-200 would be comparable to the F70-210? (for Digital). I guess a more generic question is : Is the DA50-200 designed to complement the 16-45 or the 18-55? Price-wise it looks like the 18-55, but I'm wondering in terms of performance. Sorry if this has been discussed, but just being back from vacation, I haven't had any time to start weeding through PDML emails. dk On 8/21/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd go for the DA50-200 if you're using the digital bodies. It's > light, small, has just a little more range, and is very reasonably > priced. > > Godfrey > >
