Marnie:
I love your "disturbed" "landscapes." The first one, which you describe
as "a little wierd," is may favorite. It is truely fascinating and a
unique point of view. I also like the "funny" one very much, but they
are all great.
Dan M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont know. I think part of what I try to do when I photograph is to find
something unusual, or at least something it is unusual to photograph. So most
of my pictures of birds are of dead birds, most of the pictures of my children
show them without a smile, my landscapes are disturbed etc...
This is a little weird:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=124704
and maybe this:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=140546
while this is funny (think):
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=68660
and this:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=47077
this is just a little unusual:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=87403
and maybe this:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=87116
OK, I'll stop now .-)
DagT
==========
Uh. Maybe most of what you shoot is unusual. Hehehehe.
They all fit the bill, certainly. Personally, I really the first one.
Marnie
