Better, IMO - here's what looks pretty good on my screen: http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/adj.jpg
I think we're at the point of splitting hairs, really, as I don't think either of our results is clearly "better," just somewhat different interpretations, and with the differences in monitors, who knows how other may even see these. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Bruce Dayton > Based on your recommendation, I went back and punched it up just a > bit. I think it does look just a bit better, although it has a slight > effect on the skin tones. I'm suspecting my monitor is just a shade > more contrasty than yours. > > Anyway, here's the changed image: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0110_amber_042a.htm > > and the original: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0110_amber_042.htm
