because you didn't read the thread and you can. and because people don't want to hear the same exact arguments and counter arguments over and over again. What is needed is NEW contibutions from you that WERE NOT already fully covered. If you are too lazy to read what we have already discussed than you are being extremely rude to the list members by walking in at the last moment of a very long thread and expecting anyone to repeat it all over and over again just for you. NO - its VERY wrong for you to expect a retread of entire thread you missed when all you need to do is read it first. What don't you understand about that simple concept? Think dude its hard to believe you are even asking for that let alone expect that.... jco
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:49 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > IF you want a copy of the messages I have them all > otherwise leave the thread if you don't want to > read it because its already been noted that > these things have been aswered over and over > again ALREADY. Interjecting the same things now > isnt productive because we have to waste time > discussing things in duplicate and triplicate. > JUST FOR YOU? I thought you weren't going to reply until I read the entire thing....... Anyway, we've been down this road together probably a half dozen times in the past couple of years, and hand in hand, we'll walk down it again, probably another half dozen times in the next couple of years. It's just a thread in a mailing list John. In the grand scheme, it's not all that important. BTW, over the course of reading the choice gobbets, I recall reading much the same thing from you, repeated over and over again more than in duplicate or triplicate. If you'll do it for them, why not for me? William Robb
