Well actually.... it could cost pentax less that nothing.. I don't see why it woundnt make pentax money because it adds more value to the camera than it costs to put it in there to due to improved handing of millions of K/M lenses which owned by real people with real money to spend on a BETTER body..... jco
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 5:55 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > > So your "NO ONE" declaration doesn't have an ounce > of truth to it and its so over the top wrong that > no one is going to find you very credible if > you keep that up. Sort of like the same credibiltiy issues that keep cropping up when people say it would cost Pentax nothing to offer full support to K/M lenses? Curiously William Robb
