Donkey? - I have told you repeatedly that If I say something is the way it is and present an explaination why its true ***believe it or not, that's sometimes called a "proof"** ( and I did, go look for it). Then the next step is for you to either explain why what I said is wrong or inconclusive. If you cant. then shut up. I don't need to provide third party evidence for you. IF you know why I am wrong then say so, if I made factual errores then say so. IF you want to present some third party evidence that proves me wrong your welcome to it. but my contention is my contention and you cant claim its false just by demanding a third party report on it. You go get your own. or at least have something to say why I am wrong. YOU have neither which is worthless non-argument... jco
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:16 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > > > JCO REPLY-... I have told you three times already that is not > the case...K/M support does not interfere with digital > or any of the later lens series and including up to > the latest and current one. Get it? Evidence please. You are very good at braying like a donkey, not so good, it seems, at backing up your statements with proof. I've asked you several times to back up your statements with hard evidence, you keep evading. Please put up, or shut up. William Robb
