Me? , no dude, you have that backwards. Lets get that straight right now.
YOU were the one who started demanding stupid stuff like HARD EVIDENCE & corporate documents and declaring people crazy fools and liars if they didn't. I think you should be quite embarrassed by now at your foolish demands. And BTW, there is a price to pay for all these flip flops flips per post and unending contradictory position changes. The thread is being recorded word for word so all these things are "in the book" so to speak - a permanent public record now exists of all your incredible contradictions in the name of what? K/M support you don't even use? Was it worth it to be busted for a fraudulant arguer with no real point or position? Because that is where you have landed.....I am still right where I started on my position and I never had to flip flop and contradict myself because I have a real position and argued it in the real way. Not just a bunch of phony flip flops... jco -----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:04 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > Chris, My post was intended to teach WR > a burden of proof lesson and I wasn't seriously demanding > a response. Chris JOCK is very good at demanding from others that which he is unwilling to do himself. I think the term for this is hypocrisy. William Robb
