Tom C. wrote: >( A nice camera, but not very improved spec-wise) I beleive there was significant changes: Faster AF speed, faster FPS, flash compensation, the ability to HOLD shutter speed at 1/250 secs, and programable choise of "green" mode. And of cource the rather toyish panarama function.
I'd be rather pleased to see an upgraded "D" with faster AF, faster FPS, faster Flash Sync and larger buffer. But of course this will hardly bring new customers to choose Pentax, even thoug many Pentaxians may decide to upgrade. Jens Bladt Arkitekt MAA http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 29. september 2005 17:56 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax... OTOH, I remember what their upgrade to the PZ-1p turned out to be. :( A nice camera, but not very improved spec-wise. Tom C. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax... >Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:37:38 +0000 > >I think this prediction is in line with what most of us have come to >believe, and I can't imagine that it would provoke a flame war. I'll be >happy with a higher resolution APSC replacement for the D. At least for >now. My remaining concern would be in regard to buffer size and write >speed, but I can't imagine that Pentax would introduce an upgrade that >didn't offer a major improvement in this area. By the way, wouldn't it be >nice if the current battery grip fits the new D? >Paul > > > > > > Not to start another flame war, but I thought these were good posts on >Dpreview: > > > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=15223744 > > > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=15224522 > > > > I know we have gone over this before and many of you might have already >seen > > these particular posts, but I thought they are really good summaries of >where > > Pentax is at. > > > > Derek > > > > > > >
