Hi there, > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Really, their track record to date is pretty good.
I'd agree they're pretty good from what I've seen. > More to the point, would Pentax, a company which, for all we like > to lament > about it, puts a product on the table which takes a pretty damned good > picture, make a camera that took a bad quality picture? If they would. Nothing wrong with making cameras that take bad quality pictures. > for all we like to lament about it I skip those days. Gautam > -----Original Message----- > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 8:27 PM > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: BAD NEWS: Pentax +Samsung DSLRs > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gautam Sarup" > Subject: RE: BAD NEWS: Pentax +Samsung DSLRs > > > > > The question IMO is can Sansung/Pentax sell enough > > cameras with cheap, noisy sensors to develop and > > sustain a line with non-noisy sensors. > > More to the point, would Pentax, a company which, for all we like > to lament > about it, puts a product on the table which takes a pretty damned good > picture, make a camera that took a bad quality picture? > Really, their track record to date is pretty good. > > William Robb > > >
