Pentax's' Marketing Dept (I'm making a bold assumption here) must
become somewhat exercised at the publishing of such mis-information.
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
technology and operator ability seem to trump all else.
In the optical dark room, everything works off of the initial careful
focus.
Jack
--- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > I've been reading again.
> > This time it's an article ("What's New With Zooms") in the Dec '05
> > issue of Outdoor Photographer.
> > Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats,
> > identifies
> > which have at least on element of "Aspherical/Special Glass." An
> > article foot note explains that "special glass" includes LD or
> > low-dispersion.
> > They have put together five groups of which include all the well
> known
> > major camera makers as well as independent lens makers.
> > I won't set down the complete article here, but in each case Pentax
> is
> > the only maker which shows an "N/A" in every zoom group. A few do
> show
> > "none". How that differs from "N/A", I can't guess.
>
>
> N/A is what lazy journalists put when they don't see the info in the
>
> published specifications.
>
> Bob
>
>
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
