On 12/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated 12/11/2005 5:52:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Me too.
>
> -frank ("~real~ b&w is shot on film") theriault
>
> ps: I hope I don't really have to put a smiley WRT the above; please
> don't flame me...
> ========
> Grrr. If you don't switch to digital then we will come and get you and...
>
> Sheesh, I can't see why anyone would care what others choose to use -- film
> or digital. Not that one can't ask out of curiosity, I just can't see why
> anyone should get upset about it.
>
> ...whip you with wet noodles.
>
> Marnie aka Doe ;-) I've always like that threat -- it's so limp.
I'm not worried about getting flamed for sticking with film, but
rather for my tongue-in-cheek quip about "real b&w" is shot on film".
I've seen some pretty good conversions for digital, and I just wanted
a pre-emptive strike against you digitalians who might jump all over
me about it, that's all.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
