"Perp?" You're watching too many crime shows on TV. If the police thought he was guilty, if they had enough evidence against him, why was he not charged?
You say that you "don't believe we are talking about taking pictures in the bathtub or a group of shirtless 4-year-olds playing in a splash pool.." Well, what do you believe he allegedly did? Tell us specifically what he did. You can't, because you don't know. You can only assume things based on vague information provided by Kevin. What you "believe" has nothing to do with justice and fairness, guilt or innocence. Your beliefs have nothing to do with the facts of the situation. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Gary Sibio > >The question in my mind is what did he specifically admit to? None of us > >know to what he exactly admitted. For example, he may have taken innocent > >pics and his uncle may have sent them to porn sites. He may have some > >peripheral involvement, but not enough to be guilty of any crimes. IOW, we > >on this list do not know enough to make a reasonable judgement. We only > >know what Kevin has said, and he admits to having a bias as his children > >were allegedly photographed. Kevin has not provided enough specific > >information about what this man has allegedly done. Some of the statements > >Kevin has made is leading me to think that he is biased, prejudicial, > >mean-spirited, and irrational. > > If there were any extenuating circumstances, I would think he - the > perp - would have mentioned them. I don't believe we are talking > about taking pictures in the bathtub or a group of shirtless > 4-year-olds playing in a splash pool. > > The man has injured innocent children. He must pay for his crime. His > rights ended when he admitted what he did.
