No experience to offer with this scanner in particular, but you didn't mention the brand of scanner software. You may want to try VueScan if you're not using that already (http://www.hamrick.com/). You can download and test drive it for free.
I wasn't having much success with my Minolta 5400's bundled software, but VueScan was a worthwhile upgrade in my case. Something else to consider is the amount of RAM it may take to perform the "post-processing" for a MF frame. Are you simply running low on RAM and the software has stupid error messages? (Wouldn't be the first time...) Tim On 1/13/06 7:51, Pål Jensen wrote: > Anyone on this list using this scanner? > > Some observations: > > This scanner is excellent. > The MF film holder is close to useless - you need the glass holder which > incidentally cost a fortune and must be the most profitable item in the > history of manufactured goods. > The highlight/shadow adjustment functions are excellent. However, it creates > artifacts. Anyway to minimize or remove these? > > The main problem: Grain removal function (digital GEM) do not work with > Medium Format (work well with 35mm). I get an error message when using this > function when scanning (preview works) saying "There was an error performing > a post processing" (sounds like a software problem). Is this normal (theres > nothing in the manual saying it doesn't work with MF)? > > > Pål > > > >
