I really like photo #3.
(I like the 100/2.8 macro as well)
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Seriously, once you start shooting with it, you'll be surprised
>just how good it is. John Francis has reported some light fall off
>at 2.8, and I think he's right, but it's quite slight. You'd be hard
>pressed to find any other fault with it. Just don't expect to do
>much hand-held Velvia work with it.
>
>I've been tempted to report it to Albano as my favorite lens, but I'm
>too fond of my FA35/2AL to decide between the two. But you can get
>some idea of how much I use it by looking at my latest site update;
>numbers 2, 3, and 5 were all taken with the 80-200/2.8.
>
>Doug
>i like the FA100/2.8 Macro too
>
>
>At 3:27 PM -04007/27/01, Mark Roberts wrote, or at least typed:
>>Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Oh, geeze, I didn't tell you that I got rid of mine? Yup, traded it
>>>for a Tamron 28-200. Figure I'll never have to change lenses again.
>>>
>>>Doug
>>>just kidding
>>
>>You don't say...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
