> > From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/07 Tue AM 04:37:00 GMT > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix > > The messages I'm referring to were vulgar and aggressive. If you want to > know why the idea was canned, ask your brethren why they needed to write > "dear jackass" letters. > > I didn't expect that from the PDML, so yes, I didn't think this through. > > Please now, I am aware of my mistake; let's move on. > > -Aaron
As someone who queried the sensibility of what was proposed by Pentax, I have to say that I find the actions mentioned above disgusting. mike > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix > Date: Mon Feb 6, 2006 11:23 pm > Size: 479 bytes > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > In a message dated 2/6/2006 7:25:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I too was surprised by the negativity and suspicion. You can't lose > your copyright without expressly agreeing to the same. > Paul > ======== > Okay, read rest of thread. I shouldn't have said anything. But someone didn't > think this idea through. Obviously people would worry about copyrights. And > not everyone is informed about them, that there are inherent copyrights. > > Marnie aka Doe > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
