Those types of responses were definitely out of line. Why not just ignore
those people instead of withdraw the request?
Tom C.
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:37:00 -0500
The messages I'm referring to were vulgar and aggressive. If you want to
know why the idea was canned, ask your brethren why they needed to write
"dear jackass" letters.
I didn't expect that from the PDML, so yes, I didn't think this through.
Please now, I am aware of my mistake; let's move on.
-Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Mon Feb 6, 2006 11:23 pm
Size: 479 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
In a message dated 2/6/2006 7:25:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I too was surprised by the negativity and suspicion. You can't lose
your copyright without expressly agreeing to the same.
Paul
========
Okay, read rest of thread. I shouldn't have said anything. But someone
didn't
think this idea through. Obviously people would worry about copyrights. And
not everyone is informed about them, that there are inherent copyrights.
Marnie aka Doe
