Oh, this is about Pentax MF stuff - as opposed to Pentax 35mm. Why is that an issue? You want to use MF lenses for 35mm cameras or DSLR's?
Pentax MF lenses (645) should be excellent if Pentax wants to be compeditive in the digital MF segment, ehre others are alrady miles ahead (Hasselblad, Rolleiflex, Mamiya, Fuji, Sinar and who else...). I guess Pentax MF lenses are quite good, although perhaps not the best there is. Regards Jens -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 11. februar 2006 13:17 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Lenses for 645D? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 35mm lenses sharper than MF-lenses? No way. The DOF is greater due to the > smaller format. That's all. > The rest is a question of polishing glass. Of course the 35-mm lenses are > smaller, thus smaller tolerences - in order to obtain a CORRESPONDING > quality measuere. That doesn't make them sharper, though. Well, my experience is still that MF lenses from Pentax are less sharp than comparable 35mm K-mount lenses as long as we keep the basement consumer stuff out of the discussion (equivalents to these doesn't exist in MF). Pål
