On 2/14/06, Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Just last week, I received an SMC F 70-210/4-5.6 that I purchased
> on eBay.
>
> First, I shot a few test shots at home using
> my *ist DS and this lens, comparing it to my Tamron AF 70-300/4-5.6.
> I was surprised that at the same settings (70 and 210 /4, /8)
> the resolution was very comparable.
>
> On the weekend we went on a whale watching tour, so I thought
> it would be a good test for this lens to see how it behaves with
> different lighting conditions.
> (I thought SMC can show its advantage in the case of a "complicated"
> light.)
>
> Here are a few shots:
> http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/WhaleWatch/
>
> IMGP2888 ISO 800, 1/1500, f/6.7, 210 (70-210)
> IMGP2943 ISO 200, 1/750, f/11, 85
> IMGP2945 ISO 200, 1/750, f/16, 210 (70-210)
> IMGP2966 ISO 200, 1/750, f/6.7 210 (70-210)
> (minimum manipulations in Photoshop: exposure correction, removal of a
> dust speckle from the sky by the "clone stamp" tool in photoshop,
> PEF->jpg, resizing).

I've been whale-watching many times, and other than one spectacular
occasion, when we came upon a pod of humpbacks, I've seen about as
many whales as you seem to have.  <LOL>

I like your pix, BTW.

As between the 2nd and 3rd shots, I prefer the darker one - better mood, IMHO.

cheers,
frank



--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to